We should have steeped in more forcefully during the invasion of Georgia during the opening ceremony but "shiny and the feels.". I'll admit I was happy at the time things didn't pop off and I feel remorse for that which is why I am so forceful about it now.
You're not at fault here. The real issue is very deeply rooted since the 80s - the West and America especially are deathly afraid of a collapse of the Russian state, which is why they sent monetary aid to the late Soviet Union and later Yeltsin's Federation, and why the West is still (!) so hesitant about 'escalation' with Russia - if there is a shock to the Russian system, like a complete defeat of its military in Ukraine, Russia will become a failed state, ruled by warlords. But what then of the thousands of nuclear warheads?
There is some sense in this policy, but of course, not to such extreme that everyone from Guterres to Obama to Merkel to Biden and everyone else went for.
It's also from a time where we thought providing services and money to fascist would literally bribe them into not being fascists. Both domestic and foreign policy.
A very selective account that leaves out the false flag act of mass murder to hasten Yanukovych’s ouster that was the massacre of the ‘Heavenly Hundred’ on the Maidan. When ‘snipers sent by Putin and Yanukovych’ all conveniently escaped without a single casualty from the heavily armed ‘Maidan Self Defense’ fighters who had an arsenal of hunting rifles pistols and grenades less than a block away. In retrospect the first crime of the new Kiev regime installed by the treasonous CIA director John Brennan and backed by the likes of Victoria Nuland.
I see a lot of the same things like the Texas republic filibusters going on here. We should have confronted then but it would have been "messy".
We should have steeped in more forcefully during the invasion of Georgia during the opening ceremony but "shiny and the feels.". I'll admit I was happy at the time things didn't pop off and I feel remorse for that which is why I am so forceful about it now.
You're not at fault here. The real issue is very deeply rooted since the 80s - the West and America especially are deathly afraid of a collapse of the Russian state, which is why they sent monetary aid to the late Soviet Union and later Yeltsin's Federation, and why the West is still (!) so hesitant about 'escalation' with Russia - if there is a shock to the Russian system, like a complete defeat of its military in Ukraine, Russia will become a failed state, ruled by warlords. But what then of the thousands of nuclear warheads?
There is some sense in this policy, but of course, not to such extreme that everyone from Guterres to Obama to Merkel to Biden and everyone else went for.
It's also from a time where we thought providing services and money to fascist would literally bribe them into not being fascists. Both domestic and foreign policy.
Yeah, appeasement on fuckin roids
A very selective account that leaves out the false flag act of mass murder to hasten Yanukovych’s ouster that was the massacre of the ‘Heavenly Hundred’ on the Maidan. When ‘snipers sent by Putin and Yanukovych’ all conveniently escaped without a single casualty from the heavily armed ‘Maidan Self Defense’ fighters who had an arsenal of hunting rifles pistols and grenades less than a block away. In retrospect the first crime of the new Kiev regime installed by the treasonous CIA director John Brennan and backed by the likes of Victoria Nuland.